Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided August 17, 2005No. 06-04-00144-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice CORNELIUS (Retired).

A jury convicted Frank Richardson of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Richardson’s punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, was set by the jury at forty years’ confinement.

Richardson’s only contention on appeal is that his conviction should be reversed because the State’s notice that it intended to enhance his punishment by prior convictions was untimely. We reject this contention and affirm the judgment.

If the State intends to enhance a defendant’s punishment by prior convictions, it must give the defendant reasonable notice…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Fairrow v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  3. Splawn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  4. Hackett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  5. McNatt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. James Davenport, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1991
  2. Cory D. Marks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  3. Jeffrey C. Vaccaro v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  4. Ledarryl Andre Murph v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API