Legal Opinion

Ulman v. Estate of Bock

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1970No. File 10716PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENTTO, Judge.

This proceeding concerns the interpretation of the residuary clause of the will of Fred Bock, deceased. The county court determined that the property devised and bequeathed thereby was distributable per stirpes and not per capita. On appeal the circuit court affirmed. This appeal is taken from that action by five nieces and nephews of the testator, being five of the eight children of a brother who predeceased him, claiming that the distribution should have been per capita.

The will in question, drawn by a lawyer, was executed July 19, 1965. Following several specific bequests,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Thompson v. ThorntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. In re the Estate of SmithCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1929
  4. Briggs v. BriggsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Johnston v. HerrinIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of JetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Estate of KlauzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Matter of Estate of BolSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re Estate of SeefeldtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In Re the Estate of BickelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API