Legal Opinion
Boucher v. Salem Rebuilding Commission
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 13, 1916PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus. The case has been reported* “on the pleadings and agreed statement of facts ... for the determination of the full court.” It was said respecting similar phraseology in a reservation in Scanlon v. Carey, 207 Mass. 285, 286, “The reservation in this case is informal, but the parties have treated it, and we treat it as intended to report to this court questions of law that arose at the hearing, which was all that properly could be reserved or reported under the statute. R. L. c. 173, § 105.”† It has been held that “Questions of discretion are, "in their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reinman v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Bartlett v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Wyeth v. Board of Health of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Electric Welding Co. v. PrinceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Kilgour v. GrattoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Selectmen of Topsfield v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- School Committee of the City of Lowell v. Mayor of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Atlantic Maritime Co. v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Lawrence v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Peckham v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.