Legal Opinion

People v. Gould

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 18, 1996No. 96SA55PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This lawyer discipline proceeding comes to us on a stipulation, agreement and conditional admission of misconduct between the respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel. C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommended that the respondent be publicly censured for possession of a controlled substance, cocaine. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission including the recommendation of a public censure. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. People v. MooreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. People v. StevensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API