People v. Gould
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
This lawyer discipline proceeding comes to us on a stipulation, agreement and conditional admission of misconduct between the respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel. C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommended that the respondent be publicly censured for possession of a controlled substance, cocaine. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission including the recommendation of a public censure. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.
I
The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- People v. MooreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- People v. StevensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001