Legal Opinion
Lamar v. City of St. Louis
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 8, 1988No. 53200PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals after the trial court granted defendant City of St. Louis’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed plaintiff’s petition. We reverse and remand.
In his first amended petition, plaintiff, a laborer at the time for Corrigan Co., alleged that on April 25, 1978, he was working in a ditch at Fourth and Washington streets in St. Louis when the ditch caved in on him, causing serious, permanent injury. He named the City of St. Louis, the Metropolitan Sewer District of St. Louis, and two private contractors as defendants, alleging “the defendants, and each of them”…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jones v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Edwards v. HeidelbaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Oberkramer v. City of EllisvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- St. Joseph Light & Power Co. v. Kaw Valley Tunneling, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. AppelquistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilkes v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- Wollard v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Junior College District of St. Louis v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- State Ex Rel. City of Marston v. MannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Halamicek Bros., Inc. v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.