Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of Marston v. Mann

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1996No. 20372PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN PROHIBITION

2Per curiam

Judge David C. Mann (Respondent) denied the City of Marston’s (Relator) motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted. The motion is based on the defenses of sovereign immunity and the public duty doctrine.. The Relator seeks a Writ of Prohibition, alternatively in Mandamus, to restrain Respondent from proceeding with the case against Relator. We issued a Preliminary Order in Prohibition, which we now make absolute as amended.

In the underlying lawsuit, Carl and Peggy Allred (Plaintiffs) allege that Relator is liable…

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jones v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  2. Kanagawa v. State by and Through FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. Wilkes v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Memorial Hospital v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brennan Ex Rel. Brennan v. Curators of the University of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Junior College District of St. Louis v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  3. State Ex Rel. Division of Motor Carrier & Railroad Safety v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. Benoit v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Gregg v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API