Legal Opinion

Mecleary v. John S. Mecleary, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided January 22, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The complainant seeks to enjoin the voting of seventy shares of stock claimed to be held by the defendants Brittain, Scheule and Lambert.. He also seeks to enjoin the corporation from issuing the said stock to the said three defendants. This is on the theory that the certificates which Lambert as president pro tempore assumed to sign, do not constitute legal evidence of the fact of the issuance and ownership of the shares in question. The complainant further seeks to restrain the sale and transfer of the disputed shares by the three defendants who claim to own them to any other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bruch v. National Guarantee Credit Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crown Emak Partners, LLC v. KurzSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  2. Belle Isle Corporation v. MacBeanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
  3. Schoen v. Consumers United Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
  4. In Re Chelsea Exchange Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
  5. Tomlinson v. Loew's Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API