Legal Opinion

Ruff v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 21, 2001No. 45095-6-IPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

Two physicians diagnosed Sandra Ruff with porphyria, a rare, mostly hereditary disorder of blood enzymes. They testified before the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals that the condition was caused by her workplace exposure to chemicals during a building remodel. On appeal to the superior court of the Board’s adverse decision on the worker compensation claim, the trial court excluded evidence of the causal relationship between the diagnosis of Ruff’s porphyria and her workplace chemical exposure based on Frye.1 Because the testimony of the two doctors and the methodology of the blood test…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Reese v. StrohWashington Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Anderson v. AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Grant v. BocciaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Grant v. BocciaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Lewis v. Simpson Timber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API