Legal Opinion
May Const. Co., Inc. v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided July 7, 2000No. 00-364PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENSKI R. SMITH, Justice.
Petitioner May Construction Company (“May”) ice. this Petition for Writ of Prohibition in response to an order entered by the Pulaski County Circuit Court to compel discovery in an arbitration matter between May and Respondent Riverdale Development Company (“Riverdale”). May and Riverdale signed a contract for construction of a commercial office building on August 30, 1996. They included in the contract a term for mandatory binding arbitration for any breach-of-contract claims. As the project neared completion, May and Riverdale vigorously disputed each others…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Nucor Holding Corp. v. RinkinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Hanley v. Arkansas State Claims CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- West Memphis School District No. 4 v. Circuit Court of Crittenden CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Anthony v. KaplanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Bates v. McNeilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Showmethemoney Check Cashers, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Riverdale Development Co. v. Ruffin Building Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- E-Z Cash Advance, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- State v. DawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Cash in A Flash Check Advance of Arkansas, L.L.C. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.