Legal Opinion
Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Department of Labor
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbraham N. G-eller, J.
This action was brought pursuant to the provisions of section 111 of the Labor Law as an appeal from a determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the State of New York (“ Board ”) whose decision sustained, after a hearing, challenged portions of Industrial Code rule No. 41 (relating to aerial performers), effective December 15, 1952 (published in N. Y. Off. Comp, of Codes, Rules & Reg., 8th Supp., pp. 426-429). Rule No. 41 was adopted by the Board to supplement and implement the provisions of section 202-a of the Labor Law, which deals with the ‘ ‘ protection of aerial performers…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hegeman Farms Corp. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Matter of Kilgus v. Bd. of Estimate of City of NyNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Mary Lincoln Candies, Inc. v. Department of LaborNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Sigety v. IngrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Murach v. Island of Bob-Lo Co.New York Supreme Court · 2000