Peterman v. Peterman
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.
The question in this case is whether the chancellor below was correct in ordering ROBERT L. PETERMAN (appellant) to pay VALERIE S. PETERMAN (appellee) for the professional services of her solicitor in connection with the proceedings before the court. The amount of the counsel fee is not an issue. 1
The power of a court of chancery to require the husband to pay the wife alimony and counsel fees rests fundamentally upon the existence of the marital relation. 2 So, when the marriage is dissolved by divorce, the former wife is not entitled to an allowance of counsel fees inci dent to further…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carter v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
- Quinn v. QuinnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Kriedo v. KriedoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Andrews v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Sullivan v. AuslaenderCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kramer v. KramerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Colonial Carpets, Inc. v. Carpet Fair, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Staley v. StaleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Renwick v. RenwickCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Sartoph v. SartophCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.