Legal Opinion

Wright v. Weimeister

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Livingston. (Newton, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This is an action of assumpsit, commenced by attachment September 25, 1889, against John and Albert Weimeister. John died October 3, 1889; and April 29, 1890, his death was suggested, and the suit revived against the defendant. The sole question in controversy was whether John and Albert were copartners.

John Weimeister and one Neil O'Hearn had been for many years engaged in general merchandising and banking in the village of Howell. August 8, 1889, they dissolved, O'Hearn selling to John Weimeister. John Weimeister continued in the business, and plaintiffs claim that Albert became a partner…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parshall v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. StormsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Van Kleeck v. McCabeMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Upton v. UptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API