Legal Opinion
Diliberti v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 3, 1984No. 551-80CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*506ORDER
SETO, Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on two motions filed concurrently on June 29, 1983, by plaintiff following dismissal pursuant to a finding for defendant on cross-motions for summary judgment. The first is a “Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Judgment Order” and the second is a motion for an extension of time in which to file notice of appeal. For the reasons set forth below this court denies both of the plaintiff’s motions.
BACKGROUND
This court, pursuant to defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, filed an opinion in favor of the United States on April 29,1983.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tyrone SILAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- S. John Chipser v. Kohlmeyer & Co., a Partnership, and Thomson & McKinnon Auchincloss Kohlmeyer, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Albert M. Spound v. Mohasco Industries, Inc., Albert M. Spound v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Estate Butler's Tire & Battery Co., Inc. v. Ferrous Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Jacqueline Selph v. Council of the City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Phyllis G. Kyle v. Campbell Soup CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Cleek Aviation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Cleek Aviation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Cygnus Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Howard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.