Legal Opinion
Mallory v. Ohio University
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 11, 2003No. 01-4111PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
Benjamin C. Mallory filed a complaint against Ohio University (the “University”) for sexual discrimination under Title IX. 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1688, alleging that the University discriminated against him by initiating a disciplinary proceeding against him and by concluding that he committed sexual assault under the University’s code of student conduct. Mallory also filed state-law defamation claims against three students — Ryan Davis, Bradley Pitcher, and Harris Pratsinakis — each of whom made statements in connection with Mallory’s disciplinary proceeding. The district…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McLean v. 988011 Ontario, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Syed Saifuddin Yusuf v. Vassar CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- John Doe v. David BaumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- John Doe v. Miami Univ.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Doe v. Trustees of Boston CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Doe v. University of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Doe v. Salisbury UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.