Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Mobil Oil Corp.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided November 18, 1997No. CIV. A. 95-4174PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

VANCE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendants Mobil Oil Corporation, SpeeDee Oil Change Systems, Inc. and G.C. & K.B. Investments for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ antitrust claims. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion is GRANTED.

INTRODUCTION

This is an action by present or former franchisees against defendants SpeeDee Oil Change Systems, Inc. (“SOCS”), a nationwide “quick lube” franchisor, G.C. & K.B. Investments, Inc. (“Investments”), SOCS’ regional franchisor for the Gulf States, and Mobil Oil…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commercial Data Servers, Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  2. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
  3. Metzler v. Bear Automotive Service Equipment Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
  4. Schafer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007
  5. Window World of Baton Rouge, LLC v. Window World, Inc.; Window World of St. Louis, Inc. v. Window World, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API