King v. Second Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
The criminal prosecution out of which this action for malicious prosecution grew was for willfully and knowingly, without the consent of the owner, entering upon, cutting, and carrying away standing timber of the value ef $25, or more, made grand larceny by Code, § 4905.
Without dispute the offense had been committed. The timber of nonresident owners of timbered land in Alabama had, without the consent of the owner or any one authorized to act for him, be.en recently cut and carried away. No question of mistaken boundary line was involved as to this timber.
Appellee, Will…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. PryorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Morgan v. BairdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Smith v. DollarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brack v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Alabama Power Co. v. NeighborsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- In Re the Grand Jury Appearance Request by LoigmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Huffstutler v. EdgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Wright v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.