Legal Opinion

Langhorne v. Richmond City Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 15, 1894Published

Error to circuit court of city of Eichmond. Action by Charles M. Langhorne against the Eichmond Eailway Company, otherwise known as the Eichmond City Eailway • Company and the Eichmond Eailway & Electric Company. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to his declaration, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtFauntleroy, J.

The petition of Charles M. Langhorne, an infant, who* sued by Jennie E. Langhorne, his next friend, complains-of a judgment pronounced by the circuit court of the city of Eichmond on the 22d day of June, 1891, in an action of trespass on the case therein pending, wherein he is plaintiff, and the Eichmond Eailway Company (also known as the Eichmond City Eailway Company and the Eichmond Eailway & Electric Company) is defendant. There was a demurrer to the declaration, which said demurrer was sustained by the court, and the suit was dismissed, with costs against the plaintiff. The question to be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boardman v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Columbus, Chicago, & Indiana Central Railway Co. v. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. MoffittIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette Railroad v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Prouty v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API