Legal Opinion

Hirsch v. Weiner

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Brooklyn, sixth district, rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, landlords, in an action to recover the reasonable rent of premises occupied by the defendant, tenant.

1Opinion of the CourtKelby, J.

Thirty-four actions were brought against as many tenants living in premises 2104 and 2114 Catón avenue, in the borough of Brooklyn, city of New York. All of these actions were tried together as one, and separate judgments rendered. Each of the actions was brought to recover five months’ rent, viz., for the months of October, November and December, 1920, and January and February, 1921. The amount of rent reserved in written leases, executed by the several parties herein, is claimed to be the reasonable rental value of the several apartments.

In the particular action tried, the one arising under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. A. C. & H. M. Hall, Realty Co. v. MoosAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1921
  2. People ex rel. Fitchburg R. Co. v. HarenNew York Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kress, Dunlap & Lane, Ltd. v. DowningDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1961
  2. Kennedy Bros. v. SinclairCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Nod-Away Co. v. WoehrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. People ex rel. Sebring v. DowdNew York Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API