Legal Opinion
Machesney v. Lar-Bev of Howell, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 22, 2013No. 10-10085PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
SEAN F. COX, District Judge.
On March 14, 2013, this Court heard oral argument with respect to pending Motions for Class Certification in three separate actions that assert claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, including this action. In addition, the parties have extensively briefed the motions. For the reasons that follow, the Court shall DENY Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification in this action.
BACKGROUND
A. General Factual Background
A recent published opinion issued by the United States Court of Appeals for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Young v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Pilgrim v. Universal Health Card, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Dorothy Weathers v. Peters Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Imhoff Investment, L.L.C. v. Alfoccino, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- American Copper & Brass, Inc. v. Lake City Industrial Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Hawk Valley, Inc. v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Brown v. Rita's Water Ice Franchise Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Compressor Engineering Corp. v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.