Geiser Threshing Machine Co. v. Farmer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Brown county, Macdonald, J., presiding, (acting for the judge of the 9th district,) refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
The defendants executed three promissory notes running to plaintiff, all at the same time, and for one and the same consideration. This action is brought upon *429the two notes last falling due. Upon the other note an action had been previously brought, which resulted in a verdict of no cause of action, upon which judgment was entered in favor of the defendants for their • costs. As defences in the former action, the defendants alleged that the sole consideration of the note sued .-on was the sale by plaintiff to defendants of a threshing machine, with a warranty that the machine was in all…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thompson v. MyrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- McKnight v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Watkins v. American Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- O'Brien v. ManwaringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Minneapolis Harvester Works v. BonnallieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.