Legal Opinion

Linsell v. Halicki

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1927No. Docket No. 115PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'Sharpe, C. J.

On July 11, 1926, plaintiff caused an advertisement to be published in a Detroit paper, offering for sale a vacant lot in the “Connors and Gratiot section, apartment site, first lot north of Gratiot. * * * Will consider four fiat.” The defendants Halicki were -at that time the vendees in a contract with the other defendants; for the purchase of a four-family flat on the southeast corner of Canton avenue and Benson street in Detroit at the price of $24,000, on which payments had been made reducing the unpaid principal to $17,486.29. They read the advertisement, talked with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rust v. ConradMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Randolph's v. Quidnick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Solomon v. ShewitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Lingemann v. NaoumsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. State Security & Realty Co. v. ShafferMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marvin v. Solventol Chemical Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Brooks v. Towson Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Johnston Realty & Investment Co. v. GrosvenorMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Gillette v. Metzgar Register Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Harmon v. MuirheadMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API