Legal Opinion
Brazell v. Windsor
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided November 8, 2007No. 4309PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStilwell, J.
Cecil and Jackie Brazell appeal the order of the circuit court dismissing their request for the remedy of rescission. The order was issued following a motion made pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. We affirm. 1
FACTS
On October 20, 2004, the Brazells and Audrey Windsor entered into a contract for the purchase and sale of a home located at 8509 Oyster Factory Road, Edisto Island, South Carolina. The parties agreed that the closing date would be November 30, 2004. The Brazells had executed a HUD-1 Settlement Statement and deed conveying the property to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ellie, Inc. v. MiccichiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- King v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Spence v. Spence Ex Rel. SpenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Overcash v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Clearwater Trust v. BuntingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brazell v. WindsorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Brazell v. WindsorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009