Davis v. Huber Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dickinson District Court. — Hoy. A. D. Bailie, Judge. Action to recover commissions for the sale of machinery. Trial, and verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.
i default-d^cretSSof court:. While the issues were being settled, the court granted the plaintiff leave to amend, and ordered that the amendment be filed within thirty days. This was 11 done, and the defendant’s motion for a default because thereof was overruled, and the time for filing the amendment was extended. There was no error in this. The trial court has large discretion in matters of this kind, and, unless a clear abuse thereof is shown, we will not interfere. No default was actually entered, and the court very properly overruled the motion therefor. Davis v. Brady, Morris, 101;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blodgett v. Sioux City & St. Paul R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Hanna v. CollinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Swails v. CissnaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Walker v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hays v. HoganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
- Clark ex rel. Clark v. Van VleckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Strand v. Grinnell Automobile Garage Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Wood v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Hutto v. Snap-On Tools CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.