Legal Opinion

United States v. Footman

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided May 28, 1982No. SPCM 16362PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HANFT, Judge:

Footman pled guilty to the larceny of a stereo amplifier which belonged to Larry McEnany. The trial judge then conducted what has commonly, but incorrectly, become known in military jurisprudence as an inquiry into the “providency” of a plea of guilty. The term “providency” is not recognized by Mr. Webster, and although “providence” and “provident” are recognized words, the correctness of their use in a judicial setting is doubtful. Be that as it may, and call it what you will, the trial judge, in attempting to list the elements of the offense of larceny,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. PretlowUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. KilgoreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  4. United States v. WheelerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  5. United States v. WilliamsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. LubyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API