Legal Opinion

Benedict v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, J".

This suit is upon a note given by defendant Smith to Fletcher Benedict and by him endorsed to the plaintiff. The plea of Smith is the general issue, with special plea of discharge in bankruptcy. Special pleas are not allowed in this State: Comp. L. § 5794; but where one ■is put in it is customary to allow it to stand as a notice of ■defence ; and there can be no valid objection to that course. ■Special pleas were abolished to avoid technicality and prolixity, but notices containing the substance of special pleas are required where such pleas were formerly essential, and if the one…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Craig v. SeitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Joyner v. Bank of MenloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. Preston v. NewcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Sawyer v. RectorSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1888
  5. Graves v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API