Legal Opinion

Amerman & Patterson Inc. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 25, 1924No. 2180PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MartiN, Presiding Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

The merchandise involved, in this case was imported from Cuba under the tariff act of 1913. It was described upon the invoice as pineapples in brine, and the importer claimed free entry for it under the enumeration of “fruits in brine” in paragraph 488 of the act. The collector, however, assessed it with duty at the rate of 1 cent per pound, under the provision for ' ‘ all edible fruits, * * * prepared in any manner, not specially provided for,” in paragraph 217 of the act.

The following is a copy of paragraph 488, and of the pertinent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Delapenha v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Causse Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Edenfruit Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  2. Moscahlades Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Betz v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  4. Christo Poulos & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. G. B. Raffetto Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API