Furlong v. Thomssen
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Daniel Dillon, Judge. The defendant’s claim for exemptions may be made at the trial, or at any time before the sale. The State x. Emerson, 74 Mo. 607; The State x. Earrell, 6 Mo. App. 581; Hirshizer x. Tinsley, 13 Mo. App.' 489; Wallace x.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Daniel Dillon, Judge. The defendant’s claim for exemptions may be made at the trial, or at any time before the sale. The State x. Emerson, 74 Mo. 607; The State x. Earrell, 6 Mo. App. 581; Hirshizer x. Tinsley, 13 Mo. App.' 489; Wallace x. Lawyer, 54 Ind* 509. Where a person or corporation not subject to garnishment is indebted to an insolvent person, a bill in equity will lie to aid a creditor of such insolvent in appropriating the credit to the satisfaction of his demand. Pendleton x. Perlcins, 49 Mo. 565; Luthy x. Woods, 1 Mo. App. 167; Beal x. Me…
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiff, being a judgment creditor of the defendant, Thomssen, and being unable to obtain satisfaction by ordinary process of execution, brought this suit in the nature of creditor’s bill against Thomssen and the city of St. Louis, alleging that the city was indebted to Thomssen in a large sum, by reason of a certain contract between Thomssen and the city, whereby Thomssen had engaged to erect an engine house for the city, and praying that *366satisfaction, of Ms judgment and costs be decreed out of tbe moneys in tbe bands of tbe city owing to Tbomssen. Tbomssen and tbe city filed separate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pendleton v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Osborne v. SchuttSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- State ex rel. Conklin v. BaradaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Luthy v. WoodsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876
- State ex rel. Reagan v. RomerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arlington State Bank v. PaulsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Dickinson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Ault v. EllerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890