Legal Opinion

Luthy v. Woods

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1876PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Pendleton v. Perkins, 49 Mo. 565 ; Wag. Stat. 1012; Henderson v. Dickey, 50 Mo. 165 ; Almett v. Leper, 48 Mo. 321; Murry et al. v. Freeman et al., 44 Mo. 521; Turner v. Adams, 46 Mo. 99 ; McDowell v. Cochran, 11 111. 31; Postlewaite v. Howes, 3 Clarke (Iowa), 366 ; Hadden v. Spades, 20 Johns. 554 ; Bigelow v. Congregational Society, 11 Yt. 283 ; Williams v. Hubbard, Watkins’ Ch. 28; Kippen v. Glancy, 2 Blackf.

Read the full summary

Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Pendleton v. Perkins, 49 Mo. 565 ; Wag. Stat. 1012; Henderson v. Dickey, 50 Mo. 165 ; Almett v. Leper, 48 Mo. 321; Murry et al. v. Freeman et al., 44 Mo. 521; Turner v. Adams, 46 Mo. 99 ; McDowell v. Cochran, 11 111. 31; Postlewaite v. Howes, 3 Clarke (Iowa), 366 ; Hadden v. Spades, 20 Johns. 554 ; Bigelow v. Congregational Society, 11 Yt. 283 ; Williams v. Hubbard, Watkins’ Ch. 28; Kippen v. Glancy, 2 Blackf. (Ind.) 336 ; Scott v. McMillan, 1 Litt. (Ky-) 302 ; Farrar v. Haselden, 9 Rich. (S. C.) Eq. 331; Greenway v. Thomas, 14 111. 272; Pope v.…

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.

Luthy filed a petition in the St. Louis Circuit Court, in which he stated, first, a legal demand against Woods & Barnes, and asked judgment for it against them ; and then proceeded to state that they were utterly insolvent, having no means or property that could be reached by legal process ; that the Board of President and Directors of the St. Louis Public Schools was a municipal corporation, and not subject to garnishment; that said corporation was indebted to Woods & Barnes in the sum of $2,700 ; that by no means could this fund be subjected to the satisfaction of the claims of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  2. Merry v. FremonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  3. Turner v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  4. State Savings Ass'n v. KelloggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  5. Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty of Huntington v. NicollNew York Supreme Court · 1808

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Buckley v. MaupinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Luthy v. WoodsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Kankakee Woolen Mill Co. v. KampeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Burnham, Munger & Co. v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Dickinson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API