Legal Opinion
School Dist. of Waterloo v. Hutchinson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1993No. S-91-601PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.
The appellant, School District of Waterloo (Waterloo), claims that the district court erred when it affirmed a county court ruling that Waterloo had no authority to charge a fee for bus transportation provided to students who live more than 4 miles from their school.
We reverse the affirmance of the district court for Douglas County and remand this cause to that court with direction to remand the cause to the Douglas County Court with instruction to enter judgment in favor of Waterloo.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Statutory interpretation is a matter of law in connection with which an appellate court has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Douglas County Bank & Trust Co. v. StamperNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Galstan v. School District of City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Fulk v. School Dist. No. 8 of Lancaster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- Warren v. Papillion School District No. 27Nebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- Malzahn v. Transit AuthorityNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Interest of JANebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Spencer Ex Rel. Spencer v. Omaha Public School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Citizens of Decatur for Equal Education v. Lyons-Decatur School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Kolesnick Ex Rel. Shaw v. Omaha Public School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Waite v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.