Starr International Company, Inc., on Its Behalf and on Behalf of a Class of Others Similarly Situated v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Fifth Amendment Taking and Illegal Exaction Claims; Motions to Dismiss Shareholder Derivative Action Due to Corporation’s Refusal of Plaintiffs Demand Under RCFC 23.1; Application of Business Judgment Rule Under Delaware Law; Waiver of Demand Futility Argument by Making Demand; Independence of Board Members Appointed During Government Control; Whether Counsel Advising Corporation Had Conflict of Interest; Standing to Bring Direct Claims.
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
WHEELER, Judge.
Plaintiff Starr International Company, Inc. (“Starr”) commenced this lawsuit against the United States…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Starr International Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Starr International Company, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Starr International Company, Inc., on Its Behalf and on Behalf of a Class of Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Starr International Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Starr International Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017