Legal Opinion

Futrell v. Reeves

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 8, 1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Ballard Circuit-Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hannah

Affirming.

On February 2, 1914, T. E. Futrell, being tbe owner of a tract of land wbicb be. desired to sell, entered into%a contract with Gr. J. Reeves, employing bim to find a purchaser therefor, at the price of not less than $7,975 net to tbe owner, of which $4,975 was to be cash and tbe remaining' $3,000 to be paid by the -purchaser assuming a mortgage debt against- said land, held by tbe Union Central Life Insurance Company. Tbe contract contained -this additional stipulation: “It is further understood and agreed between tbe parties .that if the party of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coleman's Ex'r v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
  2. Crane v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Lapham v. FlintSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. Metcalf v. KentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Shainwald, Buckbee & Co. v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Odem Realty Company v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Clark v. EllsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Consolidated Realty Co. v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Talbott v. TreacyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API