Legal Opinion

Meise v. Newman

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, New York county. Action by Louise Meise against Harry Newman, impleaded with others. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

This action was brought to recover upon a promissory note alleged to have been made by a firm doing business in the city of Brooklyn under the name of Doscher & Co., and indorsed by the defendant and appellant, Newman. The complaint alleged presentation of the note when due, and protest and notice to the appellant. The answer set up a general denial. Upon the trial the note was proved, and evidence was given as to protest and the circumstances of the indorsement; and the question as to whether the appellant had indorsed the note to give credit to the same was submitted to the jury, who found…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Latham v. SheffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  2. Siegel v. DubinskyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907
  3. Union Trust Co. v. BarnhardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API