Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Dubinsky

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This is an appeal by the defendant Dora Dnbinsky from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Mew Tork, second district, borough of The Bronx.

1Per curiam

This action was brought upon a promissory note, made by one Morris Dubinsky to the order of the plaintiff and indorsed by the defendant Dora Dubinsky. Dora Dubinsky, the indorser, alone defended. The complaint alleged the maturing of the note, the presentation for and refusal of payment, the protesting of the same and the duly giving of notice of protest to the defendant Dora Dubinsky. This allegation was denied, and the issue in the case was, solely, whether the notice of protest had been properly given. At the opening of the trial the plaintiffs’ attorney said: “ The signature of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meise v. NewmanNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Century Bank v. BreitbartNew York Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API