Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Olshan Foundation Repair Company of Dallas, LLC

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided June 21, 2006No. 10-06-00025-CVPublished

1ConcurrenceBill Vance, Justice

I write separately to note that, even if the FAA had been invoked, in denying Olshan’s motion to compel arbitration, Respondent could have found that no arbitration agreement existed or that Olshan’s foundation repair was done under a verbal agreement with Seay. See In re Dillard Dept. Stores, Inc., — S.W.3d-,-, 2006 WL 508629, at *1 (Tex. Mar.3, 2006) (“In reviewing findings of fact in a mandamus proceeding, we cannot substitute our judgment for that of the trial court.”). Under the FAA, courts decide whether an arbitration agreement was ever concluded, i.e., signed. Buckeye Check Cashing,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Brady v. Fourteenth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hooks v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API