State in Interest of AR
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Presiding Judge:
Appellant challenges the trial court’s determination that C.P. is a neglected child as defined by Utah Code Ann. § 78-3a-2(16) (Supp.1995) (repealed 1996). 1 Specifically, appellant argues that the trial court erred in not excluding evidence obtained during a search of her home. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
At approximately 8:00 p.m. on January 2, 1996, Third District Juvenile Court Probation Officer Steven Ha, along with youth and family specialist Mr. Coddel, went on a home visit to see appellant’s eldest child, M.R., a juvenile probationer under Ha’s supervision. On the way,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Roska Ex Rel. Roska v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Walsh v. Erie County Department of Job & Family ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- State ex rel. A.R. & C.P. v. C.R.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
- M.A. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- O'DONNELL v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.