(PC) Taylor v. Ingram
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, No. 2:21-01042 TLN SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MARSHA INGRAM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court is defendant Ingram’s motion for summary judgement on 19 plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claims. (ECF No. 58.) Ingram is the sole remaining 20 defendant in the case. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that 21…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.