Legal Opinion

Greene v. Riordan

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1929No. Docket No. 6598PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCAS, J., pro tem.

In this ease there is pending before the court a motion to affirm the judgment of the lower court by reason of appellant’s alleged failure in his duty to print in his brief or in the supplement thereto all portions of the record necessary to be considered by this court. The motion is denied and the appeal will be heard on its merits.

Plaintiff, George W. Greene, sued on three counts: First, to have an instrument, in form a grant deed, declared a mortgage; second, for a judgment for $33,000 alleged balance due under a contract of sale of real property, and third, for a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newton v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Miller v. State Board of EducationIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  2. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. MacKenzie v. AngleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. StahlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Loyd v. Southwest UnderwritersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API