Legal Opinion
Air Products & Chemicals v. Quigg
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 1988No. Civ. A. No. 87-3545PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed this complaint seeking reversal of the November 5,1987 final decision of the Assistant Commissioner for Patents (Commissioner) striking Air Products’ United States Patent application Serial No. 037,836. As grounds for its challenge, plaintiff alleges that defendant had no authority to strike the application, and that, in striking the application for inequitable conduct, defendant failed to consider on the merits whether Air Products had cured the inequitable conduct found in Driscoll v. Cebalo, 731 F.2d 878…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Driscoll v. CebaloCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Gandy v. MarbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- L. R. Willson & Sons, Inc. v. Raymond L. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coleman v. National Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2025
- Ramos v. State of New HampshireDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000