Legal Opinion
Coleman v. National Indemnity Company
District Court, D. Montana
Decided July 10, 2025No. 4:19-cv-00039Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION KENNETH COLEMAN, et al., CV-19-39-GF-JTJ Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant. Defendant National Indemnity Company (National) has moved the Court to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Class Action Complaint (Amended Complaint) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). (Docs. 56, 57 and 63). Plaintiffs oppose the motion. (Doc. 62). National’s motion should be granted. I. INTRODUCTION On February 1, 2023, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint against National. (Doc. 54).…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.