Tobacco Growers Co-Operative Ass'n v. Bland
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.
It is contended for defendant that further performance of tbe contract cannot be insisted on because plaintiff, in settlements to date for tbe crop of 1922, has wrongfully withheld $36.80 as penalty for nondelivery of certain tobacco of one of defendant’s tenants, tbe latter not being a member of tbe association. In Coőperative Assn. v. Bissett, ante, 180, it was held that tbe withholding of this amount is not warranted by tbe law or tbe provisions of tbe contract, but on authority this breach is not of sufficient proportionate importance to justify an entire severance of tbe contract…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tobacco Growers Cooperative Ass'n v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Brewington v. LoughranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Blackwell Durham Tobacco Co. v. McElweeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Westerman v. Champion Fiber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Creech v. MelnikSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Wade S. Dunbar Insurance Agency, Inc. v. BarberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Lance v. CogdillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.