Legal Opinion

Head v. Powell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is an action to recover the value of a sow. At the close of all the evidence the court gave on behalf of defendant an instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff has appealed.

The cause arose in a justice court where there was a judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $25 and defendant appealed. Plaintiff in his statement alleges that he and defendant were residents of the same township, that defendant was the owner of a sow and that on the 30th day of September, 1921, “defendant carelessly and negligently…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. FultonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Beane v. City of St. Joseph & Brittain Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Evans v. HolmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Jones v. HinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. Staetter v. McArthurMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moss v. Bonne Terre Farming & Cattle Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Buffum v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Powers v. RosenbloomSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API