Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Reynolds

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1948No. Docket No. 58, Calendar No. 44,121PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

The sole question here is as to who shall have the custody of a boy, now six years of age, the issue of the marriage between the parties hereto. In May, 1944, plaintiff was granted an uncontested decree of divorce from the defendant, and by the decree the custody of the minor was given to his paternal grandmother, in accordance with an agreement between the parties which the court approved. The plaintiff was decreed to pay $5 per week for the child’s support. He has since remarried.

In March, 1947, the defendant filed a petition to amend the decree, and to give her the custody of the child.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. BurkhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Sargent v. SargentMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Gorton v. GortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brugel v. HildebrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Mault v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Ostergren v. OstergrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. House v. HouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Russick v. RussickMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API