Legal Opinion

Nowinski v. Randall H. Hagner & Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1953No. 1390Published

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellant was sued for possession of an apartment on the grounds that she had violated a provision of her lease and was using the premises in such a manner as to constitute a nuisance. The provision of the lease allegedly violated was as follows: “ * * * That the Lessee will not use said premises * * * in any manner which will disturb the tenants of the building or be offensive to any occupant of the building ‡ $ »

Trial was by the court, and a judgment for possession was awarded to the landlord. The judge made findings in the landlord’s favor on both grounds set forth…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Merritt v. KayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1924
  2. Klein v. LongoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Hall v. Henry J. Robb, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Smith v. WorksmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Davis v. Professional Bldg. Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API