Nowinski v. Randall H. Hagner & Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellant was sued for possession of an apartment on the grounds that she had violated a provision of her lease and was using the premises in such a manner as to constitute a nuisance. The provision of the lease allegedly violated was as follows: “ * * * That the Lessee will not use said premises * * * in any manner which will disturb the tenants of the building or be offensive to any occupant of the building ‡ $ »
Trial was by the court, and a judgment for possession was awarded to the landlord. The judge made findings in the landlord’s favor on both grounds set forth…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Merritt v. KayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1924
- Klein v. LongoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Hall v. Henry J. Robb, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Smith v. WorksmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Davis v. Professional Bldg. Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.