Legal Opinion
Merritt v. Kay
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 5, 1924No. 3931PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Acting Associate Justice.
This is a writ of error to the municipal court of the District of Columbia for correction of any errors that may have be.en committed in a suit commenced by John E. Merritt for the restitution of certain premises alleged by him to be unlawfully detained by Florence Means Kay.
The record discloses that on the 28th of February, 1922, Higbie & Richardson, a corporation, in consideration of the payment to it in advance of $55 on the 1st day of every month, let and demised by its written lease to Florence Means Kay an apartment in the Rochester apartment house. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. MowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Bertram v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Ryerson v. EldredMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Holt v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
- Chiera v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Cities Service Oil Company v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Woods v. Forest Hill Cemetery, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- Bailey v. ZlotnickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Arsenault v. AngleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Klein v. LongoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.