Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Frederick

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1983No. Civ. 6108PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZENOVICH, Acting P. J.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether the trial court abused its discretion in setting aside that portion of the interlocutory decree stipulated to by the parties dividing the husband’s military pension, on the ground of mistake of law, before subsequently announced federal decisional law ruled that military pensions are not subject to division as community property. We conclude the trial court abused its discretion and reverse.

On October 1, 1980, at a contested dissolution hearing, Daniel Frederick (husband) and Bertha Frederick (wife) entered into a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Palos Verdes Faculty Ass'n v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re Marriage of BuikemaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. In Re Marriage of MahoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Aloy v. MashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Thomas v. Lyles (In Re Thomas)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1984
  3. Walentowski v. WalentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re Marriage of AnkenmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Mueller v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API