Legal Opinion

Bondick v. Ricoh Imaging Americas Corporation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 13, 2022No. 1:21-cv-06132Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOE BONDICK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 21 C 6132 v. ) ) Judge Virginia M. Kendall RICOH IMAGING AMERICAS ) CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Joe Bondick filed this lawsuit on November 16, 2021 against Defendant Ricoh Imaging Americas Corporation (“Ricoh”). (Dkt. 1). Eight years ago, in 2014, Bondick purchased a K-50 camera manufactured by Ricoh through a third-party retailer. The camera included a one- year warranty and functioned effectively for at least four years. After…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Reichle v. HowardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Brewster McCauley v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API