Brown v. Granatelli
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentJohn R. Brown, Circuit Judge
Prologue
I agree with the court that the plan does not cover newborns. Consequently the *1356plan is not liable to the Browns. My real point of difference is that, in-my point of view, under Texas law,1 the policy issued by NALAC is a group policy of accident or sickness insurance thus triggering Texas’s mandatory coverage of newborns. Thus NALAC, independent of the plan, is liable to the Browns under its insurance policy.
!}, * * -It fc *
The court’s opinion2 allows insurance companies, authorized to carry on the business of insurance in Texas, which issue policies insuring employee benefit plans,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Richard Lucas v. United States of America, Richard Lucas, Cross-Appellees v. United States of America, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- United Food & Commercial Workers & Employers Arizona Health & Welfare Trust, a Trust Dennis Davison Raymond Florom v. Renee Ann PacygaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Northern Group Services, Inc. v. Auto Owners Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.