Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown v. Granatelli

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 11, 1990No. 89-2171Published

1DissentJohn R. Brown, Circuit Judge

Prologue

I agree with the court that the plan does not cover newborns. Consequently the *1356plan is not liable to the Browns. My real point of difference is that, in-my point of view, under Texas law,1 the policy issued by NALAC is a group policy of accident or sickness insurance thus triggering Texas’s mandatory coverage of newborns. Thus NALAC, independent of the plan, is liable to the Browns under its insurance policy.

!}, * * -It fc *

The court’s opinion2 allows insurance companies, authorized to carry on the business of insurance in Texas, which issue policies insuring employee benefit plans,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Richard Lucas v. United States of America, Richard Lucas, Cross-Appellees v. United States of America, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  4. United Food & Commercial Workers & Employers Arizona Health & Welfare Trust, a Trust Dennis Davison Raymond Florom v. Renee Ann PacygaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Northern Group Services, Inc. v. Auto Owners Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API