Legal Opinion

Cash v. O'Connor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 24, 1943No. 4-7063PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The parties to this litigation each owned what was once an island in the Mississippi River, and they derived their titles through separate grants from the state of Tennessee. By accretions to each, the islands have now joined and are now known as Booker’s Towhead. The controlling question in the case is that of the location of the correct present boundary between these grants.

There has been protracted litigation of this question in the courts of Tennessee and, by stipulation, three opinions of Tennessee courts have been incorporated into the record now before us. The first of these opinions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. BertigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Williams v. NicholSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  3. Clopton v. BookerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1872
  4. Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  5. O'Connell v. SewellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bell v. WadleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API