Legal Opinion

Bell v. Wadley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 10, 1944No. 4-7194PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.

G. C. Wadley sought to replevy his $3,000 check held by Walter L.. Pope as escrow agent. Pope’s answer was that actual parties in interest were W. F. and Bina Bell, to whom proceeds were conditionally payable. The Bells intervened. By way of cross complaint they alleged that the fund was earnest money and part payment in respect of obligations assumed by Wadley in a written contract. There were other pleadings, including a motion by the cross complainants to transfer to equity, and Wadley’s motion to remand, which was overruled. The appeal is from the Chancellor’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Muller v. DowsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Phelps v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Harris v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  4. Hume v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Womack v. ConnorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tolley v. TolleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  2. Cobb v. National Lead Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1963
  3. Ladd v. LaddSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Lewis v. GraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  5. Cavalier County v. GestsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API