Legal Opinion

Bell Finance Co. v. South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 14, 1988No. 1242PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

This case involves the chapter within the South Carolina Consumer Protection Code that relates to consumer loans. CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA §§ 37-3-101 et seq. (1976 and Supp. 1987). The basic question that the South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs raises in its appeal concerns whether the filing requirements of Section 37-3-305(8) of the South Carolina Code of Laws (1976 and Supp. 1987), apply to restricted lenders such as the respondent Bell Finance Company, Inc. We hold that they do so and reverse.

Bell Finance, as a “restricted lender,” is licensed by the South…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Busby v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Smith v. South Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. Multimedia, Inc. v. Greenville Airport CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Brown v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tilley v. Pacesetter Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Weston v. Carolina Research & Development FoundationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Centex International, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API